论文研究
arxiv.org ·
校准置信度的海市蜃楼:视觉语言模型中言语化置信度的轨迹无关性
该 arXiv 论文发现,在作者评估的视觉语言模型与校准方法中,模型言语化表达的置信度在很大程度上与推理轨迹无关:模型可以反复自我纠错、最终给出错误答案却仍报告高置信度。作者从内容变化、token 掩码和模型自身犹豫标记三个角度分析,指出置信度对推理轨迹内容不敏感,且校准训练可能反而加剧这种脱节。由于 ECE、AUROC 等现有指标无法检测该问题,论文提出轨迹接地分数 TGS,包括比较有无自身轨迹时置信度的 TGS-self,以及检验模型是否对正确轨迹给出更高置信度的 TGS-pair,并构建覆盖 10 个基准、含受控好坏轨迹对的 TGS-Bench,显示传统校准排名与轨迹接地排名存在分歧。
AI推荐理由 arXiv 新论文,提出视觉语言模型言语化置信度与推理轨迹脱钩的问题,并给出 TGS-self/TGS-pair 两种轨迹接地评分及 TGS-Bench 基准,指出 ECE、AUROC 等现有校准指标无法检测该问题。属于可验证的方法与评测贡献,对 VLM 可靠性与校准评估有实际参考价值;局限是仅基于摘要,尚无复现或第三方验证。
78
正文
Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2609.18453 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Sep 2026]
Title:The Mirage of Calibrated Confidence: Trajectory-Independence of Verbalized Confidence in Vision-Language Models
Authors:Jisoo Yang, Jaeho Han, Trung X. Pham, Junyeong Kim
View a PDF of the paper titled The Mirage of Calibrated Confidence: Trajectory-Independence of Verbalized Confidence in Vision-Language Models, by Jisoo Yang and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A calibrated Vision-Language Model (VLM) can repeatedly self-correct, say "Wait, I should recheck," arrive at the wrong answer, and still report high confidence. We find that this occurs because verbalized confidence is largely trajectory-independent in the VLMs and calibration methods we evaluate. We examine this through three complementary lenses: content variation, token masking, and the model's own hesitation markers. We show that confidence is insufficiently sensitive to what the reasoning trajectory actually contains, and that calibration training can paradoxically worsen this disconnect. Since existing metrics like ECE and AUROC cannot detect this problem, we propose the Trajectory-Grounding Score (TGS) in two complementary forms: TGS-self, which compares confidence with and without access to the model's own trajectory, and TGS-pair, which tests whether the model assigns higher confidence to correct trajectories than to flawed ones along the vision, reasoning, and answer axes. We propose TGS-Bench, a model-agnostic suite spanning 10 benchmarks with controlled good/bad trajectory pairs, and show that conventional calibration rankings diverge from trajectory-grounding rankings, exposing a blind spot in current evaluation practice.
Comments:
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as:
arXiv:2609.18453 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2609.18453v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.18453
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Jisoo Yang [view email]
[v1]
Wed, 16 Sep 2026 10:45:11 UTC (4,665 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled The Mirage of Calibrated Confidence: Trajectory-Independence of Verbalized Confidence in Vision-Language Models, by Jisoo Yang and 3 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
new
|
recent
| 2026-09
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
NASA ADS
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
×
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)