最新资讯
dev.to 让模型改写文档前,先量化事实保真度 dev.to 回放 153 个 Claude Code 与 Codex 会话,审计 Agent 的生产影响范围 dev.to 银行 77 意图分类最便宜 LLM:GPT-6.1 Terra 每次成功任务 $0.000727 theinformation.com Chesky的副业:Airbnb向CEO新设AI实验室出售IP theverge.com OpenAI 宣布数据中心项目不再与公职人员签署保密协议 dev.to NVIDIA 发布四个开放 Cosmos 3 仿真模型 dev.to 真实 MCP 客户端击穿我们服务器的五种方式 theverge.com Airbnb 正在开发 AI 旅行 agent,计划 2027 年上半年推出 wechat 这可能是美国AI最魔幻的一天。 nytimes.com 美众议院共和党领袖要求 Nvidia 黄仁勋闭门简报 pub.towardsai.net 忘掉我:为记忆而设计的系统中的删除难题 marktechpost.com Google 发布 Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash:15 秒视频,每秒 0.07 美元
多元动态
登录 注册
大模型 arxiv.org ·

打破失败级联:面向医学多模态推理的步骤感知强化学习

原文 我的收藏

该论文指出医学视觉问答中早期推理错误会级联导致最终答案错误,而现有后训练流程以结果为中心、信用分配稀疏。作者提出 MRPO(Medical Reasoning-aware Policy Optimization),在最终答案错误时对更早的无效推理步骤 token 施加指数级更大惩罚,从而打断失败级联且不损害成功路径。摘要称在四个多模态 LLM 骨干上持续优于标准 GRPO 和近期 RL 基线,Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking 在医学 VQA 上超过 HuatuoGPT-Vision-34B 4.59 分,早期推理失败率由 58.6% 降至 13.4%。代码已公开。

AI推荐理由 arXiv 论文(v2,2026-09-24 修订),作者与摘要明确,属可验证的研究首发。核心新信息是 MRPO:在最终答案错误时对早期无效推理步骤的 token 施加指数级更大惩罚,以打断医学多模态推理中的失败级联;摘要称在四个多模态 LLM 骨干上优于标准 GRPO 与一个近期 RL 基线,Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking 在医学 VQA 上超过 HuatuoGPT-Vision-34B 4.59 分,并将早期推理失败率从 58.6% 降至 13.4%。局限:这些数字均来自论文自述,未提供独立复现或基准细节,且仅限医学 VQA 场景,通用性待验证。

78

正文

Computer Science > Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition arXiv:2606.31825 (cs) [Submitted on 30 Jun 2026 (v1), last revised 24 Sep 2026 (this version, v2)] Title:Breaking Failure Cascades: Step-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Medical Multimodal Reasoning Authors:Junha Jung, Minbyul Jeong, Suhyeon Lim, Sungwook Jung, Jaehoon Yun, Taeyun Roh, Mujeen Sung, Jaewoo Kang View a PDF of the paper titled Breaking Failure Cascades: Step-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Medical Multimodal Reasoning, by Junha Jung and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract:Recent multimodal large language models have shown great promise in clinical image reasoning, but existing post-training pipelines remain predominantly outcome-centric, relying on final answer correctness or sequence-level preferences. This suffers from sparse credit assignment, making it difficult to optimize the reasoning process essential for clinical applications. Our analysis reveals that cascading errors from early-stage reasoning failures are a leading cause of incorrect predictions in medical visual question answering (VQA) benchmarks. Motivated by this, we propose Medical Reasoning-aware Policy Optimization (MRPO), an RL algorithm that incorporates step-wise process rewards. When the final answer is incorrect, MRPO assigns exponentially larger penalties to tokens in earlier invalid reasoning steps, breaking failure cascades without compromising successful paths. Across four multimodal LLM backbones, MRPO consistently outperforms standard GRPO and a recent RL baseline, and on Qwen3-VL-8B-Thinking even surpasses substantially larger medical MLLMs such as HuatuoGPT-Vision-34B by 4.59 points. Moreover, MRPO reduces early-stage reasoning failures from 58.6% to 13.4%, showing that targeted mitigation of cascading failures improves both reasoning quality and final answer accuracy. Our code is available at this https URL Subjects: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) Cite as: arXiv:2606.31825 [cs.CV] (or arXiv:2606.31825v2 [cs.CV] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.31825 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Junha Jung [view email] [v1] Tue, 30 Jun 2026 15:35:19 UTC (2,979 KB) [v2] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 16:20:32 UTC (3,476 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Breaking Failure Cascades: Step-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Medical Multimodal Reasoning, by Junha Jung and 7 other authors View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.CV new | recent | 2026-06 Change to browse by: cs cs.AI References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps (What is Litmaps?) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub (What is DagsHub?) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate (What is Replicate?) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender (What is CORE?) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs. Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)

来源报道 · 1 篇 · 以下链接均前往原始媒体

← 返回精选动态 原文

更多内容